Adams Oshiomhole on Thursday declared that Senate President Godswill Akpabio would not qualify to occupy the office under the Senate’s newly amended leadership rules.
Speaking with journalists after Wednesday’s tense plenary session, the Edo North senator argued that if the new requirement mandating at least eight uninterrupted years in the Senate for presiding officers is applied fairly, Akpabio himself would be ineligible to serve as Senate President.
Oshiomhole accused the Senate leadership of attempting to manipulate the rules to reduce competition for future leadership contests in the upper chamber.
“Let me explain why this raises a serious moral concern. The Senate President became Minority Leader on his very first day in office during the 8th Senate. He immediately became a principal officer,” Oshiomhole said.
“Now, he is the one presiding over the Senate and asking us to change those same rules.”
The former Edo State governor maintained that Akpabio had not completed eight years in the Senate despite the amendment requiring lawmakers to serve at least two consecutive terms before contesting for presiding offices.
“As we speak today, the Senate President has not spent up to eight years in office. Even if you combine his previous tenure with the current one, it is still not up to eight years.
“So, if we pass a rule requiring anyone to spend eight consecutive years before becoming Senate President, then he should lead by example by vacating the position, because he himself did not meet that qualification before presiding,” he said.
Oshiomhole further criticised the amendment, describing it as an attempt to alter long-standing parliamentary traditions for political convenience.
“As leaders who emerged through a process, we must not make laws to favour or perpetuate anyone in office,” he stated.
“Senator David Mark had the honour and privilege of serving as Senate President for eight years, not by manipulating the rules.
“The same rules that enabled David Mark to preside over the Senate for eight years — what is wrong with them? The same rules that allowed the current Senate President to contest for the office — what is wrong with them? Why change them now?”
According to him, the amendment was specifically designed to narrow the field ahead of future Senate leadership contests.
“Previously, the requirement was based on one-term ranking, and he happened to be the only senator from the South-South, where the position was zoned,” Oshiomhole said.
“Naturally, more senators would now become eligible, which would broaden the field of competition. And now he wants to shut that out.”
The senator also insisted he was not intimidated by the controversy surrounding the amendment.
“If others are afraid, I am not afraid. The only person I fear is my Creator, because I have realised that whether you tell the truth or lies, the date of death cannot be shifted forward or backward,” he added.
The remarks came barely 24 hours after a heated confrontation between Oshiomhole and Akpabio disrupted plenary proceedings in the Senate.
The clash followed the Senate’s adoption of amendments to its standing orders after a closed-door session that lasted nearly three hours.
Under the revised rules, only senators who have completed at least two consecutive terms—equivalent to eight uninterrupted years—can contest for the offices of Senate President and Deputy Senate President.
During Wednesday’s plenary, Oshiomhole repeatedly attempted to raise a point of order while Akpabio moved to confirm the votes and proceedings of the previous sitting.
Akpabio refused to recognise him, prompting the former labour leader to repeatedly shout “point of order” even after his microphone was muted.
Efforts by Senate Chief Whip Mohammed Monguno to restore calm failed, forcing Akpabio to issue a stern warning.
“Oshiomhole, if you become unruly, we will use the rules to take you out of the Senate,” Akpabio warned during the tense exchange.
